you need to restore some data before the service closes. In other cases, the migration process away from Cyphertite may be more involved, e.g. In some cases, this means you simply need to find another online backup service and make the initial backup there beforeĭiscontinuing use of Cyphertite. Painful for existing users, we are giving a 2 month notice that the service is ending.
In an attempt to make transition away from using the Cyphertite service less
It is with a heavy heart that I am announcing the coming closure of the Cyphertite online backup service in 2 months’ time, on August 18th, 2015.ĭue to limited interest in Cyphertite, we were not able to generate enough revenue to justify continuing to operate the service. Here’s the letter they sent out to their users: Graham, were you aware that ANOTHER online backup service has now been shutdown (as of August 18, 2015)? If you find a warrant canary on Tresorit’s site, let me know.įound this article interesting? Follow Graham Cluley on Twitter or Mastodon to read more of the exclusive content we post. It is also recommending users that they might consider switching to a similar encrypted cloud storage service called Tresorit.
#Wuala vs tresorit download
Wuala is thankfully giving customers an opportunity to download their data, and is offering refunds to those customers who have paid in advance for the service. It may never be clear why Wuala decided to close down, but its rapid farewell can only make one wonder if there is the remotest chance, like others before it, that it preferred to close its doors rather than comply with a court-order to reveal its encryption keys. Here is the current SpiderOak warrant canary page, for instance: If a canary in a coal mine stopped singing (and subsequently died), the miners knew that the air had become toxic, requiring immediate evacuation.Ī clever method in use by some organizations to tacitly notify clients about any binding gag orders is to pre-emptively state that they have not been issued any such notice in the last few months. Wuala, unlike rivals such as SpiderOak, does not appear to have a warrant canary which (in its absence) could alert users that something peculiar was afoot.Ī warrant canary, named after the canary taken to the coalface of the early days of mining.Ĭanaries are sensitive to carbon monoxide and other lethal gasses. When a company receives a notice that they must share private information with a government entity, the notice is usually accompanied with a gag order that prohibits the company from mentioning that they have been forced to give up the information.
I have no reason to believe that Wuala’s demise is anything more than a commercial decision by LaCie/Seagate, but I am left with no way to easily tell.Īfter all, *if* the shut down was because Wuala believed it no longer had a way to protect the privacy of users from the undue attention of surveillance agencies, how would it tell me if was also served with a gag order at the same time? TrueCrypt, and Lavabit, for instance, shut down amongst concerns that they might no longer offer the protection and privacy that users might wish for, after receiving undue interest from law enforcement agencies keen for the secrets customers protect with the services to spill out. One thing that crossed my mind for a moment, was whether Wuala might have fallen for a similar fate as other products and services which had encryption at their heart. Clearly, for whatever reason, the firm has decided to rethink its plans for offering cloud-based storage services. Wuala is owned by LaCie, who in turn were acquired by parent company Seagate in 2012.
0 kommentar(er)
